2025 SEASON · WEEK 12 · DEMO DATA

Confidence Pool

Points assigned from probability, variance, and contest leverage

Synthetic demo data. No schedule, betting-market, injury, weather, or statistics API is connected. Every number shown is fabricated for interface demonstration and must not be used for wagering decisions.

balanced ranking

Reorder with the arrows to produce your final customized ranking

14
Tampa Bay Buccaneersvs NYG · 76.0% · conf 78 · edge 61.8 · Medium volatility
13
Buffalo Billsvs WAS · 67.0% · conf 51 · edge 46.0 · High volatility
  • High confidence assigned to a high-volatility game.
  • Data status is stale — treat ranking as provisional.
12
Pittsburgh Steelersvs CLE · 67.0% · conf 58 · edge 29.9 · High volatility
  • High confidence assigned to a high-volatility game.
11
Kansas City Chiefsvs IND · 83.0% · conf 85 · edge 14.1 · Low volatility
  • Data status is estimated — treat ranking as provisional.
  • Contest recommendation conflicts with the raw probability model.
10
Philadelphia Eaglesvs DAL · 79.0% · conf 81 · edge 15.1 · Medium volatility
  • Contest recommendation conflicts with the raw probability model.
9
Baltimore Ravensvs NYJ · 89.0% · conf 89 · edge 10.7 · Low volatility
  • Contest recommendation conflicts with the raw probability model.
8
Miami Dolphinsvs NE · 68.0% · conf 70 · edge 18.2 · Medium volatility
  • Contest recommendation conflicts with the raw probability model.
7
Denver Broncosvs LV · 79.0% · conf 87 · edge 10.3 · Low volatility
  • Contest recommendation conflicts with the raw probability model.
6
Los Angeles Chargersvs CIN · 58.0% · conf 60 · edge 15.1 · Medium volatility
  • Contest recommendation conflicts with the raw probability model.
5
Houston Texansvs TEN · 69.0% · conf 71 · edge 9.1 · Medium volatility
  • Contest recommendation conflicts with the raw probability model.
4
Los Angeles Ramsvs SEA · 62.0% · conf 64 · edge 11.1 · Medium volatility
  • Contest recommendation conflicts with the raw probability model.
3
Detroit Lionsvs GB · 63.0% · conf 65 · edge 10.1 · Medium volatility
  • Contest recommendation conflicts with the raw probability model.
2
Minnesota Vikingsvs CHI · 56.0% · conf 50 · edge 13.2 · High volatility
  • Contest recommendation conflicts with the raw probability model.
1
San Francisco 49ersvs ARI · 64.0% · conf 66 · edge 0.1 · Medium volatility

Correlation check

Your top four selections include 1 game(s) in high-wind environments and 2 high-volatility game(s). Correlated high-confidence exposure increases the chance of a simultaneous multi-game drawdown; consider redistributing points toward lower-variance games if your contest pays only the top finisher.