2025 SEASON · WEEK 12 · DEMO DATA

DEN @ LV

Sun Nov 23 · 4:05 PM ET · Allegiant Stadium · Indoor · Grass

Synthetic demo data. No schedule, betting-market, injury, weather, or statistics API is connected. Every number shown is fabricated for interface demonstration and must not be used for wagering decisions.

Executive recommendation

87
Confidence
82
Edge score
Las Vegas RaidersTier 1 · Elite EVVerified

Las Vegas Raiders carries the estimated edge at the current number. Bet now.

Predicted winner
DEN
Denver Broncos
Win probability
79.0%
Upset probability
21%
Cover probability
26.2%
Projected score
21–17
DEN – LV
Projected total
37.9
Market 37.5
One-score prob.
38.8%
Overtime prob.
6.5%

Decision audit

Evidence-driven

Why the pick wins
Las Vegas Raiders projects ahead on home EPA per play and holds the trench advantage (60 DL grade). The market is pricing the opponent's recent record rather than underlying efficiency.
Why the pick loses
Variance in a low-volatility game. A single turnover swing or red-zone sequence flips the projected margin.
Biggest risk
Late line movement against the recommended side would erase most of the estimated edge.
Biggest unknown
Snap-count allocation for the returning skill players.
What would change this
Confirmed inactives, a starting-quarterback change, a two-point-or-greater line move, or a wind forecast revision above 18 mph.
Confidence level
87 / 100 · Low volatility

Model consensus

Spread across models: 13.2 probability points

Market12.8% LV
Power Rating23.0% LV
ELO18.0% LV
EPA26.0% LV
Matchup22.0% LV
Injury21.0% LV
Weather21.0% LV
Game Theory24.0% LV
Material disagreement. The EPA and matchup models are more bullish on LV than the market and injury models. The recommendation weights the market model heavily because the injury picture is unresolved; treat the probability as a range, not a point estimate.

Score construction

Every score is decomposed — no black box

Confidence Score
InputValueWeightPoints
Win probability79.0%4031.6
Model agreement13.2 pt spread2011.2
Market stability1.0 pt move1510.0
Injury certaintyNo open items1010.0
Weather certaintyverified55.0
Variance profileLow1010.0
Composite77.8
Edge Score
InputValueWeightPoints
Model vs market8.2 pts of probability3523.9
Public bias15% of tickets on rec side2017.0
Contest ownership2% projected1514.3
Matchup advantage5.8 rating gap158.7
Injury impactNone1010.0
Weather impact0 mph wind55.0
Composite79.0

Team comparison

Denver Broncos (6-4) vs Las Vegas Raiders (2-8)

DENMetricLV
1.7Power rating-4.1
1543ELO1398
0EPA / play0
-0.02Offensive EPA-0.16
-0.13Defensive EPA0.05
44Success rate38.2
46Early-down success46
9Explosive-play rate9
33Pressure rate33
9.8Sack rate6.5
60O-line grade60
81D-line grade60
39Third down %39
55Red zone %55
0Turnover margin0
0.5Strength of schedule0.5
3-2 L5Recent form3-2 L5
NeutralTurnover sustainabilityNeutral
neutralRegression statusneutral

Matchup analysis

  • DEN pass rush (33% pressure) vs LV offensive line (60 grade)
  • LV explosive-play rate 9% vs DEN defensive EPA -0.13
  • Third down: LV 39% vs DEN 39%
  • Red zone: LV 55% vs DEN 55%
  • Division familiarity historically compresses margins by ~1.2 points.
  • Fourth-down aggressiveness favors DEN in neutral situations.

Market analysis

Near key number 7 — line shopping matters.

Opening spread
6.5
Current spread
7.5
Expected close
7.0
Opening total
38.5
Current total
37.5
Moneyline (home)
+684
Implied probability
12.8%
Model probability
21.0%
Market disagreement
8.2 pts
Public tickets (home)
15%
Reverse line movement
None
Steam
Detected
Sharp side
LV
Line volatility
Low
Expected value
10.3%
CLV opportunity
Positive — take current number
Bet timing
Bet now

Player availability

Unverified items are labeled and never treated as confirmed

No unresolved availability items recorded for this game in the demo data set.

Rest
Standard week
Travel
Regional
Altitude
Sea level
Bye impact
None
Playoff implications
Moderate
Resting starters
Not applicable in Week 12

Weather

Verified
Temperature
72°F
Wind
0 mph
Gusts
0 mph
Rain
0%
Snow
0%
Humidity
25%
Field
Indoor
Surface
Grass
Roof
Indoor
Scoring impact
Negligible
Passing impact
Neutral
Kicking impact
Neutral

Bias audit

Documented for every recommendation

  • Public bias: no extreme ticket concentration.
  • Primetime bias: not applicable.
  • Recency bias: last-week results were explicitly excluded from the power-rating update beyond their efficiency contribution.
  • Favorite bias: minimal.
  • Brand bias: rating inputs are efficiency-based, not reputation-based.