2025 SEASON · WEEK 12 · DEMO DATA

GB @ DET

Sun Nov 23 · 1:00 PM ET · Ford Field · Indoor · Turf

Synthetic demo data. No schedule, betting-market, injury, weather, or statistics API is connected. Every number shown is fabricated for interface demonstration and must not be used for wagering decisions.

Executive recommendation

65
Confidence
81
Edge score
Green Bay PackersTier 2 · StrongVerified

Green Bay Packers carries the estimated edge at the current number. Bet now.

Predicted winner
DET
Detroit Lions
Win probability
63.0%
Upset probability
37%
Cover probability
60.7%
Projected score
24–29
GB – DET
Projected total
52.1
Market 52.5
One-score prob.
51.1%
Overtime prob.
8.9%

Decision audit

Evidence-driven

Why the pick wins
Green Bay Packers projects ahead on road EPA per play and holds the trench advantage (60 DL grade). The market is pricing the opponent's recent record rather than underlying efficiency.
Why the pick loses
Variance in a medium-volatility game. A single turnover swing or red-zone sequence flips the projected margin.
Biggest risk
Late line movement against the recommended side would erase most of the estimated edge.
Biggest unknown
Snap-count allocation for the returning skill players.
What would change this
Confirmed inactives, a starting-quarterback change, a two-point-or-greater line move, or a wind forecast revision above 18 mph.
Confidence level
65 / 100 · Medium volatility

Model consensus

Spread across models: 12.0 probability points

Market71.0% DET
Power Rating65.0% DET
ELO60.0% DET
EPA68.0% DET
Matchup64.0% DET
Injury63.0% DET
Weather63.0% DET
Game Theory59.0% DET
Models are aligned within 12 probability points. No material conflict to reconcile.

Score construction

Every score is decomposed — no black box

Confidence Score
InputValueWeightPoints
Win probability63.0%4025.2
Model agreement12.0 pt spread2012.0
Market stability1.0 pt move1510.0
Injury certaintyNo open items1010.0
Weather certaintyverified55.0
Variance profileMedium107.0
Composite69.2
Edge Score
InputValueWeightPoints
Model vs market8.0 pts of probability3523.3
Public bias29% of tickets on rec side2014.2
Contest ownership18% projected159.0
Matchup advantage2.8 rating gap154.2
Injury impactNone1010.0
Weather impact0 mph wind55.0
Composite65.7

Team comparison

Green Bay Packers (7-3) vs Detroit Lions (8-2)

GBMetricDET
3.1Power rating5.9
1578ELO1648
0EPA / play0
0.1Offensive EPA0.18
-0.04Defensive EPA-0.03
44Success rate50.2
46Early-down success46
11.2Explosive-play rate12.8
33Pressure rate33
6.5Sack rate6.5
60O-line grade60
60D-line grade60
39Third down %39
55Red zone %55
0Turnover margin3
0.5Strength of schedule0.5
3-2 L5Recent form4-1 L5
NeutralTurnover sustainabilityNeutral
neutralRegression statusneutral

Matchup analysis

  • GB pass rush (33% pressure) vs DET offensive line (60 grade)
  • DET explosive-play rate 12.8% vs GB defensive EPA -0.04
  • Third down: DET 39% vs GB 39%
  • Red zone: DET 55% vs GB 55%
  • Division familiarity historically compresses margins by ~1.2 points.
  • Fourth-down aggressiveness favors DET in neutral situations.

Market analysis

Sitting on the key number 3 — half-point cost is material.

Opening spread
-4.5
Current spread
-3.5
Expected close
-4.0
Opening total
51.5
Current total
52.5
Moneyline (home)
-245
Implied probability
71.0%
Model probability
63.0%
Market disagreement
8.0 pts
Public tickets (home)
71%
Reverse line movement
Detected
Steam
Detected
Sharp side
GB
Line volatility
Medium
Expected value
10.1%
CLV opportunity
Positive — take current number
Bet timing
Bet now

Player availability

Unverified items are labeled and never treated as confirmed

No unresolved availability items recorded for this game in the demo data set.

Rest
Standard week
Travel
Regional
Altitude
Sea level
Bye impact
None
Playoff implications
Moderate
Resting starters
Not applicable in Week 12

Weather

Verified
Temperature
70°F
Wind
0 mph
Gusts
0 mph
Rain
0%
Snow
0%
Humidity
38%
Field
Indoor
Surface
Turf
Roof
Indoor
Scoring impact
Negligible
Passing impact
Neutral
Kicking impact
Neutral

Bias audit

Documented for every recommendation

  • Public bias: heavy home-side ticket concentration detected.
  • Primetime bias: not applicable.
  • Recency bias: last-week results were explicitly excluded from the power-rating update beyond their efficiency contribution.
  • Favorite bias: minimal.
  • Brand bias: rating inputs are efficiency-based, not reputation-based.